What are the boundaries between not lazy and lazy? Obviously, there are things that are definitely lazy and things that definitely aren’t. An example you say?
Lazy scenarios:
You have smelly teeth. You can’t bothered to go and brush your teeth.
You are thirsty. You can’t be arsed to go all the way from the living room to the kitchen to get a drink.
You have an asthma attack. You can’t be bothered to get your inhaler from your pocket.
Unlazy (correct word?) scenarios:
You want a pizza. You walk into town to get a pizza from the shop of pizzas.
You have a shower, then cook something, then have another shower to get rid of the garlicky smell.
You want to know what it’s like at 8000 feet. You climb a mountain.
But what about these?
You want to read a book before bed, but you’d need to walk into town (20 mins) to get it and the shops close in about 20 minutes and you’re not sure if they’ll be open. Would not going be lazy? Or sense?
You left your phone round your friends house and its 2 in the morning. You know he’ll be awake, but is it lazy to not go?
It depends on your outlook on life I guess.
</filler post>
File Sharing
A recently updated news story on the BBC news website entitled “UK will not legislate on piracy” caught my attention this week. File sharing is a big problem for the music industry and I can safely say that something obviously needs to be done about it. What made me laugh wasn’t the fact that there won’t be any law changes regarding this, it’s a very difficult problem to tackle, but the only comment in the entire article:
That is the only thing actually quoted from the Intellectual Property minister (there’s a position for that!?), David Lammy. Now I don’t know that much about law, but it is specifically the teenagers in their bedrooms that are perpetrating the crime. There’s no overlord. File sharing websites have their arseholes covered with 6 feet of reinforced concrete, and they’re the only other agent in this. So what’s required is either a major overhaul in the legislative system, or something to be done about the bedroom kleptomaniacs.
As far as I can see, it’s a deadlock, piracy continues to thrive and there’s nothing anyone can do in our current political system. Now, if we lived in a despotic regime or a communist state, this problem would be easily solved.
Democracy is too complicated.
Keep it simple kids, either share equally with no concept of money (which would work in a developed western country unlike Russia or Cuba (joke, in case there are any people with a sense of humour failure (if you are genuinely offended by that vague statement, kiss my ass, you’re not as mentally developed as us enlightened liberal patriots (are enlightened liberal patriots possible?)))) or let one person have all the fun.